AIVS/QUAD Assessment Input

Read Terms & Conditions

Terms v2026-04-07 | AIVS Assessment Intake

1) Purpose
This tool is designed to collect information for controlled AI assessment, rollout review and governance analysis.

2) User responsibility
Users remain responsible for checking inputs, confirming extracted answers, and reviewing any output before action is taken.

3) Upload route
Uploaded forms may be read by AI and extraction tools. Any extracted answer should be reviewed by a human before final analysis.

4) Acceptance
By ticking the box below and using the tool, you confirm you have read and accepted these terms.

I accept the Terms & Conditions and understand that human review is still required.

Access key

Email (required)

Second email (optional)

Discipline

Controlled by

If you provide an email address, we may send AI-assisted information and related documents to it. Please review any output before use.

Choose intake route

Complete form online Upload completed form

Ready.

Form 01. Client to AIVS/QUAD – Data Intake Check Form

Use at enquiry, scoping and pre-design stage. The aim is to understand the data, not to drown the client in jargon.

Complete the top intake section first: accept terms, enter access key, select discipline, and select who controls this assessment.

How will this be used?

A. Engagement basics

Client name

Name

Security Level

Description / use case

Target tools or deployment Will or do you plan to use an ISO standard?

B. Data categories in the scope

Personal data Special category data Client confidential data Legal privilege / advice Financial or banking data HR / employee data Children / vulnerable person data

Notes on data categories

C. Data location and movement

Where is the data now?

Must data remain in the UK?

Is overseas access or routing acceptable?

Is third-party storage accepted?

Is EEC hosting acceptable?

Anything where the data must never be used in AI

D. Initial critical thinking prompts

Do you know what class of data is involved, or are you guessing?

Are we dealing with a cloud convenience question or a real sovereignty requirement?

Do you have an AI policy?

Have you a data flow map?

Is there anything in scope that should trigger an immediate red flag for client?

Discipline overlay

Complete the top intake section to load the correct scope checks.

Outcome required

Critical thinking rule. Treat AI as a governed assistant, not an automatic authority. Users remain responsible for checking the result, judging whether the data should have been entered at all, and escalating anything uncertain before action is taken.

Upload completed form

Upload DOCX, PDF, PNG or JPG. The system should later extract answers into the same structure as the online form, then ask for review before final analysis.

Drag and drop file here
or click to choose a file

No file selected.

Review and analysis output

Extracted / reviewed answers

Nothing reviewed yet.

Analysis result

No analysis yet.